The well succeeded experience of the Reference Center for Men’s Health (Centro de Referência da Saúde do Homem) on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Photoablation with Diode Laser Urobeam
Endoscopic resection of prostate

How to Cite

Claro, J. de A. (2012). The well succeeded experience of the Reference Center for Men’s Health (Centro de Referência da Saúde do Homem) on the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Boletim Do Instituto De Saúde - BIS, 14(1), 119–126. Retrieved from https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/bis/article/view/33727

Abstract

The non-cancerous growth of the prostate, known as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), is extremely common and commits between 50% e 80% of the
men. The most usual symptoms include weakness of urinary stream, urinary hesitancy, getting up at night to void, high urinary frequency, a feeling of incomplete bladder emptying, urgency and urinary retention. Renal insufficiency, infection and bladder collapse are also possible. Although the initial symptoms are discreet, there is a severe impact on the quality of life. In the United States, 38 million of men seek for BPH treatment and 1.5 million of surgeries are carried out annually. Traditionally, the endoscopic resection of prostate required a four-day hospitalization, with significant bleeding, that could cause renal insufficiency, with the need of ICU and hemodialysis. Presently, we carry out in the Center for Men´s Health the photoablation with diode laser of 250 W (UrobeamDornier) that brings excellent results, even in very large prostates or in patients with urinary retention. The Urobeam laser surgery is conducted with no bleeding, no risk of renal insufficiency and no need of hospitalization, with a saving from US$ 800.00 to US$ 4,000.00, depending on the institution and the clinical condition of the patient.

PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Andriolo Jr A, Lorenzetti F. Introdução. In: Palma PCR, Dambros M organizadores. Diretrizes de laser no tratamento cirúrgico da hiperplasia benigna da próstata. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Superior de Urologia; 2011. p.13-5
2. Azoulay A, Doris NM, Filion KB , Caron J, Pilote L, Eisenberg MJ. The use of the transition cost accounting system in health services research. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2007; 5: 11-19.
3. Erol A, Cam K, Tekim A, Memik O, Coban S, Ozer Y. High Power diode laser vaporization of the prostate: preliminary results of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2009;
182: 1078-82.
4. Goh A, Gonzáles E. Photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy versus transurethral prostate resection a cost analysis. J Urol. 2010; 183: 1469-73.
5. The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project -HCUP . Supplemental variables for revisit analyses. [Acesso em 6 mar 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.hcup-us.ahrq.gov/ toolssoftware/revisit/UserGuide_SuppRevisitFiles_CD03_09v6.pdf.
6. Manzano JP, Claro JFA. Outros lasers no tratamento cirurgico da HPV. In: Palma, PCR, Dambros, M organizadores. Diretrizes de laser no tratamento cirúrgico da hiperplasia benigna da próstata. Rio de Janeiro: Escola Superior de Urologia. p. 27-8.
7. Preti L, Senathirajah M, Sun C. Evaluation of the State Ambulatory Surgery Databases, Available through the HCUP Central Distributor, 2008. Rockville: Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; 2011.
8. Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD. Etiology, pathophysiology, epidemiology and natural history of benign prostatic hyperplasia. 9.ed. Philadelphia: WB Saunders 2009; p 2727–2738.
9. Ruszat R, Sulser T, Seifert HH, Reich O, Forster T, Bachman A. Photoselective vaporization versus transurethral electroresection of the prostate: a comparing cost analysis. Eur Urol. 2006; 5(suppl): 271.
10. Sandhu JS, Ng CK, Gonzalez RR, Kaplan SA, Te AE. Photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in men receiving anticoagulants. J Endourol. 2005; 19: 1196-8.
11. State Emergency Department Databases (SEDD). Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project. [acesso em 12 jan 2012]. Disponível em: http://www. hcup-us.ahrq.gov/db/state/sedddbdocumentation. jsp.
12. Stovsky MD, Griffiths RI , Duff SB. A clinical outcomes and cost analysis comparing photoselective vaporization of the prostate to alternative minimally invasive therapies and transurethral prostate resection for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2006; 176: 1500.
13. Strope SA, Yang L, Nepple KG, Adriole GL, Owens PL. Population based comparative e effectiveness of transurethral resection of the prostate and laser therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2012, 187: 1341-5.
14. Yu X, Elliot SP, Wilt TJ, Macbean AM. Practice patterns in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical therapy: The dramatic increase in minimally invasive technologies JUrol. 2008, 180: 241-5.
15. Wei JT, Calhoun EA, Jacobsen SJ. Benign prostatic hyperplasia. Washington, D. C.: United States Government Printing; 2007. p 45- 69.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2012 Joaquim de Almeida Claro

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...