Abstract
Improvisation, voluntarism, lack of planning and other reprehensible practices of municipal management seem tobe giving way, in the last 10 years, in several locations in the country, for very positive institutionalization
initiatives of planning and formulation activities public policy. The need to have more sound technical analyses, more comprehensive social and economic diagnoses or to justify more clearly the decisions of allocation of public
resources, for the purpose of specification of Multiannual Plans or to subsidize the formulation of Participatory
Budgets, has led several municipalities to develop - in partnership with research centers or NGOs - systems of
indicators, maps or indexes of “Social Exclusion”, “Social Inequality”, “Social Vulnerability”, “Development Human", "Social Responsibility" or "Quality of Urban Life” (SPOSATI 1996, NAHAS 2002, SEADE 2003).
References
JANNUZZI,P.M. Considerações sobre uso, abuso e mau uso de indicadores nas políticas públicas municipais. Revista de Administração Pública, Rio de Janeiro, 36(1):51-72,2002.
NAHAS, M.I.P. Metodologia de construção de índices e indicadores sociais como instrumentos balizadores da Gestão Municipal da Qualidade de Vida Urbana: uma síntese da experiência de Belo Horizonte.In HOGAN,D.J et al. Migração e Ambiente nas Aglomerações Urbanas. Campinas, NEPO, 2002, p.465-487.
SEADE. Índice de Vulnerabilidade Juvenil. Acessado em www.seade.gov.br em 10/11/2003.
SPOSATI,A . Mapa da inclusão/exclusão social da cidade de São Paulo. São Paulo: EDUC, 1996.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2004 Paulo de Martino Jannuzzi