Abstract
The knowledge generated by health research contributes to drawing up policies and the good performance in the health system. In 2004, Brazil established its National Policy of Science and Health Innovation with the objective of ensuring equity in health and a wide agenda of research
priorities. The Research Program for the SUS (PPSUS), as part of this system has the capacity of inducing research for the foremost health problems of the population so they can be a part of the priority lines of investigation. This article intends to describe the defi nition of priority
research lines within the ambit of edicts from PPSUS/SP, of 2004 to 2012. The data was obtained from FAPESP records and the technical reports of the events held to defi ne research priorities. The task of priorities for the edicts PPSUS/SP was undertaken by different approaches for each edition, which is justifi ed in processes of collective construction in which retrofeeding occurs based on the evaluation of prior experience. Continuity is important in the meetings between administrators and researchers to sustain this process, as the defi nition of research priorities is a fundamental step for the incorporation of its results and effective contribution for strengthening the SUS.
References
2. Brasil. Ministério da saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos estratégicos. Seleção de prioridades de pesquisa em saúde: guia PPSUS. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2009. p.60. (Série A. Normas e manuais técnicos).
3. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa para o PPSUS: guia. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. p.76. (Série A. Normas e Manuais Técnicos).
4. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde, Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Insumos Estratégicos. Decit 10 anos. Brasília: Ministério da Saúde; 2010. p.56. (Série B. Textos Básicos de Saúde).
5. Guimarães R, Santos LMP, Angulo-Tuesta A, Serruya SJ. Defi ning and implementing a National Policy for Science, Technology, and Innovation in Health: lessons from the Brazilian experience. Cad Saúde Pública 2006; 22(9):1775-94 [acesso em 20 fev 2011]. Disponível em:
ttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-311X2006000900002&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
6. Instituto de Saúde. Programa de Pesquisa para o SUS 2006 e 2007. Documento de Referência. São Paulo; 2006.
7. Instituto de Saúde. Programa de Pesquisa para o Sistema Único de Saúde (PPSUS-SP). Ofi cina Preparatória para Seleção de Prioridades de Pesquisa em Saúde 2011-2012: etapa preliminar com gestores da SES-SP. Relatório. São Paulo; novembro 2010.
8. Instituto de Saúde. Programa de Pesquisa para o Sistema Único de Saúde (PPSUS-SP). Ofi cina para Defi nição das Prioridades de Pesquisa em Saúde 2011-2012. Relatório. São Paulo; 2010.
9. Lomas J, Fulop N, Gagnon D, Allen P. On Being a Good Listener: Setting Priorities for Applied Health Services Research. Milbank Quarterly 2003; 81: 363–388 [acesso em 18 fev 2011]. Disponível em: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1468-0009.t01-1-00060/full.
10. Pang T, Sadana R, Hanney S, Bhutta ZA, Hyder AA, Simon J. Knowledge for better health - a conceptual framework and foundation for health research systems. Bull WHO 2003;81:815-20 [acesso em 20 fev 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.scielosp.org/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0042-96862003001100008&lng=en&nrm=iso&tlng=en.
11. Souza RR. Plano Estadual de Saúde 2008-2011. São Paulo: Secretaria da Saúde; 2008. p.300.
12. Smith N, Mitton C, Peacock S, Cornelissen E, MacLeod S. Identifying research priorities for health care priority setting: a collaborative effort between managers and researchers. BMC Health Services Research 2009; 9:165 [acesso em 18 fev 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/9/165.
13. World Health Organization. World report on knowledge for better health: strengthening health systems. Geneva; 2004, p.162 [acesso em 4 abr 2011]. Disponível em: http://www.who.int/rpc/meetings/pub1/en/.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2011 Tereza Toma, Ana Aparecida Sanches Bersusa, Luiz Vicente de Souza Martino, Sonia Isoyama Venancio