Keywords
Scientific Misconduct
Plagiarism
Research Ethics
Responsibility
How to Cite
Abstract
Integrity and responsible conduct in research are essential to maintaining scientific excellence as well as public trust in science. Educational and research institutions have a duty to promote and monitor responsible conduct in research. In recent decades, many universities, educational and research institutions, scientific societies and national authorities have developed specific laws, regulations, guidelines and and procedures to direct actions to combat misconduct. In addition to particular damage caused to authors, mainly at an emotional and professional level, scientific misconduct directly affects reputation, prestige and name of the institutions involved. Adolfo Lutz Institute considers this topic extremely relevant and all the research work related to the study of integrity in scientific research as well as the proposals for institutional action in promoting a culture of scientific integrity are reported in this article.
References
Victor, B.; Cullen, J. The organizational bases of ethical work climate. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 33, i. 1, p. 101-125. 1988.
Rest, J. Morality. In: Mussen PH (series ed.) and Flavell J, Markman E (vol. eds.),
Handbook of Child Psychology, Vol. 3, Cognitive Development, 4th ed. New York, NY:
Wiley. Pp. 556–629. 1983
Victor, B. Integrity in the business environment. Presentation at the June 28, 2001, meeting of the Institute of Medicine Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, Washington, DC. 2001.
CAIRE - Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, Institute of Medicine, National Research Council, “Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment That Promotes Responsible Conduct” - The National Academy Press, Washington, 2002.
Adams, D., & Pimple, K. D. (2005). Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity. Accountability in Research, 12(3), 225-240.
ORI (Office of Research Integrity). DAB confirms HHS authority to investigate scientific misconduct. ORI Newsletter 1(4):5. EUA, 1993. URL disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/vol1_no4.pdf
RIA (Royal Irish Academy). 2010. “Ensuring Integrity in Irish Research: A Discussion Document”. Dublin: Royal Irish Academy. URL disponível em: http://www.iua.ie/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/National-Policy-Statement-on-Ensuring-Research-Integrity-in-Ireland-2014.pdf
OSTP - Office of Science and Technology Policy Federal research misconduct policy. Federal Register. 2000;65:76260–76264. URL disponível em: https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/search/pagedetails.action?granuleId=99-26608&packageId=FR-1999-10-14&acCode=FR&collectionCode=FR
TENK guidelines, Good scientific practise and procedures for handling misconduct and fraud in science, Finnish Advisory Board on Research Ethics, Finland, 2002, URL disponivel em: http://www.tenk.fi
NHMRC, Australian Code for the Responsible Conduct of Research, National Health and Medical Research Council, Australian Government, 2007. URL disponivel em: https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/r39
SCJ, Science Council of Japan, Code of Conduct for Scientists, 2006, disponível em http://www.scj.go.jp/ja/info/kohyo/pdf/kohyo-20-s3e-1.pdf
National Guidelines for SI – project SATORI – “Stakeholders Acting Together on the Ethical Impact Assessment of Research and Innovation”– Göran Collste, Linköping University, Sweden, European Commission, 2015 – URL disponível em: http://satoriproject.eu/
CBPC-FAPESP, 2011 – “Código de Boas Práticas Científicas da FAPESP” São Paulo, SP URL disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/boaspraticas/codigo_050911.pdf
RCRI, Report of the comisson of research integrity, US Department of Human Services, PHS. 1995, URL disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/report_commission_0.pdf
SSRI, Singapore Statement on Research Integrity, 22 de setembro de 2010, URL: disponível em: http://www.singaporestatement.org/
II BRISPE (Brazilian Meeting on Research Integrity, Science and Publications Ethics), 2012, URL: disponível em: http:// www.iibrispe.coppe.ufrj.br/
OAB, Ordem dos Advogados do Brasil. Comissão Nacional de Relações Institucionais do Conselho Federal da OAB. Proposição 2010.19.02136-03: Plágios nas instituições de ensino [online]. (Relatório) Brasília (DF):OAB; 2010 [acesso 2011 Mar 2]. Disponível em: http://www.oab.org.br/combateplagio/CombatePlagio.pdf
Documento CAPES, 4-01-2011, “Orientações CAPES - Combate ao Plágio” URL disponível em: https://www.capes.gov.br/images/stories/download/diversos/OrientacoesCapes_CombateAoPlagio.pdf
DOCS/CNPq, 2012 – URL disponível em: http://cnpq.br/documentos-do-cic/ e http://cnpq.br/diretrizes/
Revista Pesquisa FAPESP, ed 188, Out., 2011 – “Boas Práticas Científicas – FAPESP lança código para preservar a integridade científica” – Fabrício Marques, URL disponível em: http://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/2011/10/01/boas-praticas-cientificas-2/
Portaria FAPESP - PR nº 09/2013 – “Dispõe sobre a inclusão de cláusula de compromisso de boas práticas em Acordos e Convênios celebrados pela FAPESP com pessoas jurídicas privadas”. URL disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/8330
Santos, L.H.L., 2011, “Sobre a integridade ética da pesquisa” FAPESP, 2011, Luiz Henrique Lopes dos Santos – Coordenação adjunta da diretoria científica, URL disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/6566
IACS,UFF, 2010 - Cartilha “Entenda o que é Plágio” Instituto de Arte e Comunicação Social - IACS - Universidade Federal Fluminense URL disponível em: http://www.noticias.uff.br/arquivos/cartilha-sobre-plagio-academico.pdf
Martinson, B.C., Anderson, M.S., deVries, R. Scientists behaving badly. Nature 2005; 435:737-738. URL disponível em: https://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v435/n7043/full/435737a.html
Fanelli, D., (2009) How Many Scientists Fabricate and Falsify Research? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Survey Data. PLoS ONE 4(5): e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738
RCR – “A Danish textbook for courses in Responsible Conduct of Research” – 2017 Karsten Klint Jensen, Louise Whiteley and Peter Sandøe (eds.), URL disponível em: http://ifro.ku.dk/rcr.pdf
P. A. Bolton, - “Práticas Questionáveis na Pesquisa” - Scientific Ethics, Chapter 16, 2002. URL disponível em: http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/doe/benchmark/ch16.pdf
Portaria FAPESP - 05/2013 –“Dispõe sobre a divulgação das práticas de más condutas científicas apuradas pela FAPESP”. URL disponível em: http://www.fapesp.br/8037
ORI (Office of Research Integrity). Report of the Department of Health and Human Services - Review Group on Research Misconduct and Research Integrity, EUA, 1994, URL disponível em: https://ori.hhs.gov/images/ddblock/report_review_group_0.pdf
IAL, Portaria DG IAL 25, 26 de agosto de 2016 – Dispõe sobre a constituição do Grupo de Estudo de Integridade na Pesquisa do Instituto Adolfo Lutz, Nº 162 – DOE – 27/08/16 - seção 1 - p.39
Science Europe - Science Europe Working Group on Research Integrity, “Seven Reasons to Care about Integrity in Research” D/2015/13.324/2. URL disponível em: http://www.scienceeurope.org/policy/working-groups/research-integrity/
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2022 Braulio Caetano Machado, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo Almodovar, Adriana Pardini Vicentini, Regina Maria Catarino, Adriana Bugno , Laura Nogueira da Cruz, Helio Hehl Caiaffa Filho