Research integrity in public health – The importance of fair attribution of authorship in scientific publications
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Authorship
scientific publication ethics
scientific integrity review
public health

How to Cite

1.
Jorge Castejon M, Buzzo Almodovar AA, Moreira dos Santos Carmo A, Silva López Lopes GI, Catarino RM, Caldas Pereira T, Machado BC. Research integrity in public health – The importance of fair attribution of authorship in scientific publications . Bepa [Internet]. 2024 Nov. 21 [cited 2024 Nov. 25];21:e40951. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/BEPA182/article/view/40951
https://doi.org/10.57148/bepa.2024.v.21.40951
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Hosseini M, Rasmussen LM, Resnik DB. Using AI to write scholarly publications. Account Res. 2023; 25:1-9. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2023.2168535.

2. Lima JS, Farias MGG. Autoria em produções científicas: conceitos, critérios, integridade na pesquisa e responsabilidade na colaboração. Investig. Bibl. 2020. 34(82):103-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.22201/iibi.24488321xe.2020.82.58068.

3. Bennett DM, Taylor DM. Unethical practices in authorship of scientific papers. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003;15(3):263-70. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00432.x.

4. Monteiro R, Jatene FB, Goldenberg S, Población DA, Pellizzon RF. Critérios de autoria em trabalhos científicos: um assunto polêmico e delicado. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;19(4):III-VIII. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382004000400002.

5. Scientific Integrity Committee of Swiss Academies of Arts and Sciences. Hess CW, Brückner C, Kaiser T, Mauron A, Wahli W, Wenzel UJ, et al. Authorship in scientific publications: analysis and recommendations. Swiss Med Wkly. 2015; 145: w14108. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2015.14108.

6. Kellner AWA. Comments on convenience authorship. An Acad Bras Cienc. 2021; 93(3): e2021933. https://doi.org/10.1590/0001-37652021933.

7. Fabrício M. Crédito para todos. Edição | 221. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP. 2014. [Acesso em: 25 out. 2024]. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/credito-para-todos/.

8. UK Research Integrity Office. Good practice in research: authorship. 2017. V1.0. p.11 Disponível em: https://ukrio.org/wp-content/uploads/UKRIO-Guidance-Note-Authorship-v1.0.pdf

9. Pietrukowicz MCLC, Carvalho L; Ribeiro CK. A autoria científica em CSP. Cad. Saúde Pública. 2018; 34(11):e00174218. https://doi.org/10.1590/0102-311X00174218.

10. Albert T, Wager E. The COPE Report: How to handle authorship disputes: a guide for new researchers. 2003. (COPE Report 2003) https://doi.org/10.24318/cope.2018.1.1

11. International Committee of Medical Journals Editors. Recommendations for the conduct, reporting, editing, and publication of scholarly work in medical journals. 2024. [Acesso em: 25 out. 2024]. Disponível em: https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/

12. Anderson PA, Boden SD. Ethical considerations of authorship. SAS Journal. 2008; 2(3):155–8. https://doi.org/SASJ-2008-Comment1.

13. US Environmental Protection Agency. Scientific Integrity. Best practices for designating authorship. Washington. 2016. [Acesso em: 25 out. 2024]. Disponível em: http://www.epa.gov/scientificintegrity

14. Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Código de boas práticas científicas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. São Paulo. 2023. [Acesso em: 25 out. 2024]. Disponível em: http://www.ial.sp.gov.br/resources/editorinplace/ial/2023_8_17/codigo_de_boas_praticas_cientificas_do_ial_versao_final_2.pdf.

15. Fernandes MS, Fernandes CF, Goldim JR. Autoria, direitos autorais e produção científica: aspectos éticos e legais. Rev 28 HCPA 2008;28(1):26-32.

16. Kellner AWA. Cartas | 268: Autoria de conveniência [online]. Revista Pesquisa FAPESP. 2018. Disponível em: https://revistapesquisa.fapesp.br/cartas-268/

17. McNutt MK, Bradford M, Drazen JM, Hanson B, Howard B, Jamieson KH, et al. Transparency in authors' contributions and responsibilities to promote integrity in scientific publication. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018;115(11):2557-60. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1715374115.

18. Panter M. Dar crédito a quem merece: melhores práticas de atribuição de autoria. [Acesso em: 25 out. 2024]. Disponível em: https://files-aje-com.s3.amazonaws.com/www/brazil/_assets/docs/AJE_Melhores_Pr%C3%A1ticas_de_Atribui%C3%A7%C3%A3o_de_Autoria.pdf

19. Relman AS. Publish or perish – or both. N Engl J Med. 1977; 297(13):724:5. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197709292971313.

20. Garcia CC, Martrucelli CRN, Rossilho MMF, Denardin OVP. Autoria em artigos científicos: os novos desafios. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2010; 25(4):559-67. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0102-76382010000400021.

21. Harker J. Science journals set new authorship guidelines for AI-generated text. Environmental Factor. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS).2023/3:1-4.https://factor.niehs.nih.gov/2023/3/feature/2-artificial-intelligence-ethics

22. Ministério da Saúde. Conselho Nacional de Saúde. Resolução nº 466, de 12 de dezembro de 2012. Aprova as diretrizes e normas regulamentadoras de pesquisas envolvendo seres humanos. Diário Oficial União. 13 jun 2013; Secção 1:59.

23. Muccioli C. O comitê de ética em pesquisa (CEP) e as publicações científicas. Arq Bras Oftalmol. 2004;67(2):195-6. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0004-27492004000200002.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 Márcia Jorge Castejon, Adriana Aparecida Buzzo Almodovar , Andréia Moreira dos Santos Carmo , Giselle Ibette Silva López Lopes, Regina Maria Catarino , Tatiana Caldas Pereira , Bráulio Caetano Machado

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...