Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial activity of hydro-ethanol from vegetable extracts against MRSA and MSSA Staphylococcus aureus
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

vegetable extracts
antimicrobial agents
methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus

How to Cite

1.
Garcia CS, Ueda SMY, Mimica LMJ. Evaluation of in vitro antibacterial activity of hydro-ethanol from vegetable extracts against MRSA and MSSA Staphylococcus aureus. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];70(4):589-98. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/32519

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the antibacterial activity of vegetable extracts in the control of the Staphylococcus aureus strains, using Disk Diffusion and Minimum Bactericidal Concentration (MBC) tests. The susceptibility of 52 S. aureus strains to the hydroethanolic extracts from the following plants: (1) Psidium guajava var. pomifera, (2) Hymenaea courbaril var. stilbocarpa, (3) Pothomorphe umbellata, (5) Bidens pilosa, was tested by the methodology based on the international standards of CLSI. By comparing the results from the action of extracts concentrations prepared in this experimental study, it was found that the B. pilosa showed a minor action; P. guajava var. pomifera, P. umbellata, presented results very close to each other and revealed median actions; H. courbaril var. stilbocarpa exhibited an action markedly higher than the other extracts and the control with ethanol. The in vitro effects of the extracts evidenced the presence of antibacterial active components. This study showed that hydroethanolic extracts from plants 1, 2, 3 and 5 hold in vitro antibacterial activity on Staphylococcus aureus MRSA and MSSA.

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2011.v70.32519
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Mimica LMJ, Gonçalves MJPR, Mimica I, Rodrigues A. Sensibilidade comparativa de Staphylococcus aureusintra-hospitalares a vários antimicrobianos (1981-1982). São Paulo (SP): AMH FCMSCSP; 1982, p. 44.

2. Schlessinger D, Eisenstein BI. Bases Biológicas da Ação Antibacteriana. In: Schaechter M, Engleberg NC, Eisenstein BI, Medoff G (Editores). Microbiologia: mecanismos das doenças infecciosas. 3ª ed. Rio de Janeiro (RJ): Ed. Guanabara Koogan; 2002. p.642.

3. Chah KF, Eze CA, Emuelosi CE, Esimone CO. Antibacterial and wound healing properties of methanolic extracts of some Nigerian medicinal plants. J Ethnopharmacol. 2006;104:164–7.

4. Gutierrez RM, Mitchel S, Solis RV. Psidium guajava: A review of its traditional uses, phytochemistry and pharmacology. J Ethnopharmacol. 2008;117:1–27.

5. Gonçalves FA, Andrade Neto M, Bezerra JNS, Macrae A, Sousa OV, Fonteles-Filho AA, et al. Antibacterial activity of guava, Psidium guajava Linnaeus, Leaf Extracts on Diarrhea-Causing Enteric Bacteria Isolated from Seabob Shrimp. Rev Inst Med Trop. 2008;50 (1):11-5.

6. Betoni JEC, Mantovani RP, Barbosa LN, Stasi LC, Fernandes JR A. Synergism between plant extract and antimicrobial drugs used on Staphylococcus aureus diseases. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2006;101(4):387-90.

7. Dechoum MS. Crescimento Inicial, Alocação de Recursos e fotossíntese em Plântulas das Espécies Vicariantes Hymenaea courbaril var stilbocarpa (Hayne) Lee & Lang. (jatobá) e Hymenaea stigonocarpa Mart. (jatobá-do-cerrado) (Leguminosae-Caesalpinioideae) [tese de doutorado]. Campinas (SP): Instituto de Biologia da Universidade Estadual de Campinas; 2004.

8. Lima AF, Azevedo KS, Campos CAS, Taveira US, Rocha AA. Manejo da seiva do jatobá (Hymenaea courbaril L.) por famílias tradicionais na Reserva Extrativista Chico Mendes, Acre – Brasil. In: Anais do VIII Congresso de Ecologia do Brasil; 2007; Caxambú, MG.

9. Pereira CKB, Rodrigues FFG, Mota ML, Sousa EO. Composição química, atividade antimicrobiana e toxicidade do óleo essencial de Hymenaea courbaril (jatobá). 30ª Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Química; 2007; Águas de Lindóia, SP. 10. Fernandes TT, Santos ATF, Pimenta FC. Atividade Antimicrobiana das Plantas Plathymenia reticulata, Hymenaea courbaril e Guazuma ulmifolia. Rev Patol Trop. 2005;34(2):113-22.

10. Sponchiado Júnior EC. Atividade antibacteriana contra Enterococcus faecalis de uma medicação intracanal contendo ativos fitoterápicos de Pothomorphe umbellata [tese de doutorado]. Manaus (AM): Universidade Federal do Amazonas; 2006.

11. Isobe T, Ohsaki A, Nagata K. Antibacterial constituents against Helicobacter pylori of brazilian medicinal plant, Pariparoba. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2002;122(4):291-4.

12. Taylor L. The Healing Power of Rainforest Herbs: Bidens pilosa. Atualização em 2005. [acesso 2007 Fev 15]. Disponível em: [www.rain-tree.com].

13. Rabe T, van Staden J. Antibacterial activity of South African plants used for medicinal purposes. J Ethnopharmacol. 1997;56:81–7.

14. Schuch LFD. Plantas medicinais em atenção primária veterinária: atividade antimicrobiana frente a bactérias relacionadas com mastite bovina e com dermatófitos [tese de doutorado]. Porto Alegre (RS): Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul; 2007.

15. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. Twentieth Informational Supplement M100-S20, 30(1), Wayne, PA; 2011.

16. Falkenberg MB, Santos RI, Simões CMO. Introdução à Análise Fitoquímica. In: Simões CMO, colocar o nome dos 6 primeiros autores et al., organizador. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. Porto Alegre (RS) e Florianópolis (SC): Ed. UFRG/ UFSC; 2003. p.228 – 45.

17. Schulz V, Hänsel R, Tyler VE. Fitoterapia Racional: Um Guia de Fitoterapia para as Ciências da Saúde. 4ª ed, Ed. Manole; 2002; p. 1-40

18. Hindler JF, Munro S. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing. In: Isenberg HD. Clinical Microbiology Procedures Handbook [CD-ROM]. 2nd ed. ASM Press; 2004.

19. Valdes HAL, Rego HPL. Bidens pilosa Linné. Rev Cubana Plant Med. 2001;1:28-33.

20. Sanches NR, Cortez DAG, Schiavini MS, Nakamura CV, Dias-Filho BP. An Evaluation of Antibacterial Activities of Psidium guajava (L.). Braz Arch Biol Technol. 2005;48(3): 429-36.

21. Burkill HM. The useful plants of West Tropical Africa. 2nd ed. Families M-R. Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. 1997;(4):89–93.

22. Ilha SM, Migliato KF, Vellosa JCR, Sacramento LVS, Pietro RCLR, Issac VBL, et al. Estudo fitoquímico de goiaba (Psidium guajava L.) com potencial antioxidante para o desenvolvimento de formulação fitocosmética. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2008;18(3):387-93.

23. Simões CMO, Spitzer V. Óleos voláteis, In: Simões CMO, Schenkel EP, Gosmann G, Mello JCP, Mentz LA, Petrovick PR, organizador. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. Porto Alegre (RS) e Florianópolis (SC): Ed. UFRG/ UFSC; 2003. p.467-96.

24. Simões CMO, Schenkel, EP, Gosmann, G, Mello JCP, Mentz LA, Petrovick PR, organizador. Farmacognosia: da planta ao medicamento. Porto Alegre (RS) e Florianópolis (SC): Ed. UFRG/UFSC; 2003. p.1102.

25. Duarte MCT, Figueira GM, Pereira B, Magalhães PM, Delarmelina C. Atividade antimicrobiana de extratos hidroalcólicos de espécies da coleção de plantas medicinais CPQBA/UNICAMP. Rev Bras Farmacogn. 2004;14(1):6-8.

26. Souza GC, Haas AP, von Poser GL, Schapoval EE, Elisabetsky E. Ethnopharmacological studies of antimicrobial remedies in the south of Brazil, J Ethnopharmacol. 2004;90:135–43.

27. Middleton EJR, Kandaswami C, Theoharides TC. The effects of plant flavonoids on mammalian cells: implications for inflammation, heart disease and cancer. Pharmacol Rev. 2000;52:673-751. Occupational Safety and Health Administration. Toxic Metals, Occupational Safety and Health Administration.Washington, DC: US Depart of Labor; 2004. [acesso 2010 Mar 18]. Disponível em: [http://www.osha.gov].

28. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. Dietary Reference Intakes for Vitamin A, Vitamin K, Arsenic, Boron, Chromium, Copper, Iodine, Iron, Manganese, Molybdenum, Nickel, Silicon, Vanadium and Zinc. Washington, DC: The National Academy Press; 2001. p. 773.

29. Yusa V, Suelves T, Ruiz-Atienza L, Cervera ML, Benedito V, Pastor A. Monitoring programme on cadmiun, lead, and mercury in fish and seafood from Valencia, Spain: levels and estimated weekly intake. Food Addit Contam: Part B. 2008;1(1): 22-31.

30. World Health Organization - WHO. Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programe CODEX Committee on Contaminants in Foods. Fifth Session. [acesso 2011 Out 27]. Disponível em: [http://www.cclac.org/documentos/CCCF/2011/3%20Documentos/Documentos%20Ingles/cf05_INF.pdf]

31. United States Environmental Protection Agency - US EPA. What you need to know about mercury in fish and shellfish. EPA-823-F-04-009, 2pp; 2004. [acesso 2010 Mar 18]. Disponível em: [http://www.epa.gov/waterscience/fish/MethylmercuryBrochure.pdf]

32. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística - IBGE. Pesquisa de Orçamentos Familiares 2008-2009: análise do consumo alimentar pessoal no Brasil. IBGE, Coordenação de Trabalho e rendimento. Rio de Janeiro: IBGE; 2011. p.150.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2011 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.