Evaluation of the analytical unit for detecting Salmonella spp. in poultry at retail
Vol. 70 No. 4 (2011), BRIEF COMMUNICATION
Vol. 70 No. 4 (2011)

Evaluation of the analytical unit for detecting Salmonella spp. in poultry at retail

BRIEF COMMUNICATION
https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2011.v70.32525
Published 2011-04-01
Ricardo Seiti Yamatogi
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
Julia Arantes Galvão
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
Eduardo Delbon Baldini
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
Luiz Carlos Teixeira de Souza Junior
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
Marianna Vaz Rodrigues
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
José Paes Almeida Nogueira Pinto
Universidade Estadual Paulista, Faculdade de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia, Departamento de Higiene Veterinária e Saúde Pública, Botucatu, SP
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Salmonella
poultry carcass
rinsing
25 grams excision

How to Cite

1.
Yamatogi RS, Galvão JA, Baldini ED, Souza Junior LCT de, Rodrigues MV, Pinto JPAN. Evaluation of the analytical unit for detecting Salmonella spp. in poultry at retail. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Jul. 22];70(4):637-40. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/32525
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

Over 95 % of the cases of human salmonellosis are foodborne. Among the foods involved in transmission of these diseases are the products from animal origin, being the poultry products highly relevant. To deal with this issue, the Ministry of Agriculture, Livestocks Farming and Supply (MAPA – Ministério da Agricultura, Pecuária e Abastecimento) established a program, in order to monitor the contamination by Salmonella spp. in poultry carcasses. This study aimed at comparing the efficiency of two analytical methodologies (rinsing of chicken carcass and skin excision) for recovering the cells from this bacterium and to verify the occurrence of this pathogen in samples collected in Botucatu, SP. Analyzing 100 carcasses, and computing the results by both techniques, contamination by Salmonella spp. was detected in 43% samples. Using the rinsing technique, 81.40% (35/43) showed positive results as well as 51.16% (22/43) using the skin excision methodology. Although the rinsing technique detected high number of positive samples, no statistical difference (p > 0.05) was found between the results obtained from two methodologies. Further studies should be conducted on this issue as the poultry carcasses are crucial source for transmission of Salmonella spp., and the subsequent introduction of this pathogen on food preparation environment.

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2011.v70.32525
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. D’aoust JY, Maurer J, Bailey JS. Salmonella species. In: Doyle MP, Beuchat LR, Montville TJ. Food microbiology: fundamentals and frontiers. Washington: ASM Press, 2001. p.141-78.

2. Popoff MY, Bockemühl J, Gheesling LL. Supplement 2002 (nº. 46) to the Kauffmann-White scheme. Res Microbiol. 2004; 155:568-70.

3. Tauxe RV. Salmonella: a postmodern pathogen. J Food Prot. 1991; 54(7):563-8.

4. Fletcher DL. Influence of sampling methodology on reported incidence of salmonella in poultry. J AOAC Int. 2006;89(2):512-6.

5. Simmons M, Fletcher DL, Cason JA, Berrang ME. Recovery of Salmonella from retail broilers by a whole-carcass enrichment procedure. J Food Prot. 2003;66(3):446-50.

6. Silva JA. Microrganismos patogênicos em carne de frangos. Hig Aliment. 1998;12(58):9-14.

7. Carvalho ACFB, Cortez ALL. Salmonella spp. em carcaças, carne mecanicamente separada, linguiças e cortes comerciais de frango. Rev Ciênc Rural. 2005;35(6):1-6.

8. Brasil. Secretaria de Defesa Agropecuária. Instrução Normativa n° 70, de 06 de outubro de 2003. Institui o Programa de Redução de Patógenos Monitoramento Microbiológico e Controle de Salmonella sp. Em Carcaças de Frangos e Perus. Brasília. [acesso 2010 Nov 18]. Disponível em [http://extranet.agricultura.gov.br/sislegis-consulta/consultarLegislacao.do?operacao=visualizar&id=3136].

9. Andrews WH, June GA, Sherrod P, Hammak TS, Amaguana RM. Salmonella. In: Food and Drug Administration – Bacteriological Analytical Manual, 8th ed. Gaithersburg: J AOAC Int; 1998.p. 5.01-5.020.

10. Goodman LA. On simultaneous confidence intervals for contraste among multinomial populations. Technometrics. 1965;7(2):247-54.

11. Uyttendaele M, Troy P, Debevere J. Incidence of Salmonella, Campylobacter jejuni, Escherichia coli, and Listeria monocytogenes in poultry carcasses and different types of poultry products for sale on the Belgian retail market. J Food Prot.1999; 62(7):735-40.

12. Thomas A, Lallo CHO, Badrie N. Microbiological evaluation of broiler carcasses, wash and rinse water pluck shop (cottage poultry processors) in the country Nariva/Mayaro, Trinidad, Trinidad e Tobago, west indies. Tropiculture. 2006;24(3):135-42.

13. Santos DMS, Junior, AB, Fernandes SA, Tavechio AT, Amaral LA. Salmonella em carcaças de frango congeladas. Pesq Vet Bras. 2000;20(1):39-42.

14. Mead L, Lammerding AM, Cox N, Doyle MP, Humbert F, Kulikovskiy A, et al. Scientific and Technical Factors Affecting the Setting of Salmonella Criteria for Raw Poultry: A Global Perspective. J Food Prot. 2010;73(08):1566–90.

15. Mcavoy JM, Nde CW, Sherwood JS, Logue CM. An evaluation of sampling methods for the detection of Escherichia coli and Salmonella on turkey carcasses. J Food Prot. 2005;68(1):34-9.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2011 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.