Microbiological quality of organic and conventional tomatoes
PDF

Keywords

organic tomato
conventional tomato
microbiological quality

How to Cite

1.
Ferreira SMR, Freitas RJS de, Silva CA da, Karkle ENL, Maia TCB. Microbiological quality of organic and conventional tomatoes. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2011 Apr. 1 [cited 2024 Nov. 22];70(4):647-50. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/32527

Abstract

In view of the need to inform the producers, dealers and consumers about the capability of the vegetables in being a vehicle for microorganisms, they should receive suitable hygienic and sanitary treatment. This paper aimed at evaluating the microbiological quality of organic and conventional tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) commercialized in Curitiba city, southern Brazil. Eight samples of conventional tomatoes and four samples of organic tomatoes were collected from different sites. The microbiological analyses for detecting Salmonella spp and molds and yeasts were conducted according to the Compendium of Methods for Microbiological Examination of Foods. Total coliforms and Escherichia coli were analyzed by the PetrifilmTM methodology. The data were analyzed by variance analysis and Tukey tests. No Salmonella sp was isolated from 25 g of tomato samples. The total coliform counts ranged up to 1.4x103 CFU/g and Escherichia coli up to 2.3x102 CFU/g in conventional tomatoes. Yeasts and molds were found in conventional tomato samples up to 2.1x10, and up to 1.04 x 1012 CFU/g in organic tomato samples. This study clearly shows that the tomatoes ought to receive suitable hygienic and sanitary treatment before being commercialized.

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2011.70.32527
PDF

References

1. Sagoo SK, Little CL, Mitchell RT. The microbiological examination of ready-to-eat organic vegetables from retail establishments in the United Kingdom. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2001;33: 434–9.

2. Silva SRP, Verdin SEF, Pereira DC, Schatkoski AEM, Rott MB, Corção G. Microbiological quality of minimally processed vegetables sold in Porto Alegre, Brazil. Braz J Microbiol. 2007;38:594-8.

3. Nguz K, Shindano J, Samapundo S, Huyghebaert A. Microbiological evaluation of fresh-cut organic vegetables produced in Zambia. Food Control. 2005;7:623-8.

4. American Public Health Association - APHA. Compendium of methods for the microbiological examination of foods. 4th ed. Washington. 2001; p. 1219.

5. Official methods of analysis of the Association Analytical Chemists - AOAC. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International, 18th ed. Gaithersburg, Maryland, 2005.

6. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária. Resolução - RDC nº 12, de 2 de janeiro de 2001. Aprova o Regulamento Técnico sobre Padrões microbiológicos para alimentos. Diário Oficial [da] República Federativa do Brasil, Brasília, DF, 10 jan. 2001. Seção 1.

7. Reis KC, Pereira J, Valle RHP, Nery FC. Avaliação da qualidade microbiológica de mini-milho (Zea Mays) minimamente processado. Hig aliment. 2003;17(106):66-8.

8. Bandekar JR, Dhokane VS, Shashidhar R, Hajare S, Ghadge N, Kamat AS, et al. Microbiological quality of carrot, tomato and cucumber from Mumbai market. J Food Sci Tech. 2005;42:99-101.

9. Pingulkar K, Kamat A, Bongirwar D. Microbiological quality of fresh leafy vegetables, salad components and ready-to-eat salads: an evidence of inihibition of Listeria nonocytogenes in tomatoes. Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2001;52:15-23.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2011 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.