Abstract
concentrations in μg.L-1. Electroactive As (III) is evaluated by direct analysis. As (V) is converted into As (III) using reduction solution; the new As (III) concentration, represents the total inorganic As in the analyzed sample. As (III) and total inorganic As determination showed a work potential peak at -0.68 V; As (V) concentration was determined by subtraction [total inorganic As – As (III)]. Quantification and detection limits for As (III) were 0.22 and 0.08 μg.L-1, respectively, for a deposition time of 180 s with the linear range from 1 to 5 μg.L-1. Standard deviation for 1 to 5 μg.L-1 arsenic concentration (n = 10) was 5%. The methodology was successfully applied for identifying and quantifying the inorganic arsenic in grape juices; and the accuracy was assessed by a recovery test on spiked samples, being 98.2% for As (III) and 96.4% for As (V). These results were compared with those from hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry analyses. The grape juice samples analyzed by voltammetric technique showed As (III) and As (V) concentrations ranging 51-71 μg.L-1 and 34-60 μg.L-1, respectively.References
1. He Y, Zheng Y, Ramnaraine MM, Lock DC. Differential pulse cathodic stripping voltammetric speciation of trace level inorganic arsenic compounds in natural water samples. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2004;511:55-61.
2. Herce-Pagliai C, Moreno I, Gonzalez G, Repetto M, Camean AM. Determination of arsenic, inorganic and organic arsenic species wine. Food additives and contaminants. 2002;19:542-6.
3. Hsueh YM, Cheng GS, Wu MM, Yu HS, Kuo TL, Chen CJ. Multiple risk-factors associated with arsenic-induced skin-cancer: Effects of chronic liver-disease and malnutrition status. British Journal of Cancer. 1995;71:109-14.
4. Engel RR, Hopenhaynrich C, Receveur O. 1994. Vascular effects of chronic arsenic exposure: A review. Epidemiologic Reviews. 1994;16:184-209.
5. Carvalho LM, Nascimento PC, Bohrer D, Pilau EJ, Stefanello R. Voltammetric behavior of arsenic (III) in the presence of sodium diethyl dithiocarbamate and its determination in water and highly saline samples by adsorptive stripping voltammetric. Electroanalysis. 2006;18:1081-9.
6. Uneyama C, Toda M, Yamamoto M, Morikawa K. Arsenic in various foods: Cumulative Data. Food Additives and Contaminants. 2007;24:447-534.
7. Catarino S, Madeira M, Monteiro F, Rocha F, Curvelo-Garcia AS, Sousa B. Effect of bentonite characteristics on the elemental composition of wine. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 2008;56:158-65.
8. Weiss KC, Bisson LF. Effect of bentonite treatment of grape juice on yeast fermentation. American Journal of Enology and Viticulture. 2002;53:28-36.
9. Cervera ML, Lopez JC, Montoro R. Determination of arsenic in orange juice by dry ashing hydride generation atomic absorption spectrometry. Microchemical Journal. 1994;49:20-6.
10. Ferreira MA, Barros AA. Determination of As (III) and Arsenic (V) in natural waters by cathodic stripping voltammetry at a hanging mercury drop electrode. Analytica Chimica Acta. 2002;459:151-9.
11. EURACHEM. The fitness for purpose of analytical methods, a laboratory guide to method validation and related topics. Teddington: LGC; 1998.
12. International Conference on Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). Validation of analytical procedures: methodology. Geneva: ICH/IFPMA; 1996.
13. Instituto Nacional de Metrologia, Qualidade e Teconologia (INMETRO). Orientação sobre Validação de Métodos de Ensaios Químicos: DOQ – CGCRE – 008. Rio de Janeiro; 2007.
14. Miller JC, Miller JN. Statistics for analytical chemistry. New York: Ellis Harwood; 1993.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 2012 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal