Quantitative and descriptive analysis and sensory acceptance of yoghurt made from caprine and bubaline milk mixtures
PDF (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

yoghurt
goat milk
buffale milk
quantitative and descriptive analysis
sensory acceptance

How to Cite

1.
Bezerra M de F, Correia RTP. Quantitative and descriptive analysis and sensory acceptance of yoghurt made from caprine and bubaline milk mixtures. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2012 Jan. 1 [cited 2024 May 19];71(1):140-7. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/32403

Abstract

This research deals with sensory evaluation of a strawberry-flavored yoghurt made from caprine, bubaline and caprine-bubaline milk mixtures by using the quantitative and descriptive analysis (QDA) and the sensory acceptance test. 5 experimental milk groups were assessed: C (100% caprine milk), 7C3B (70% caprine milk and 30% bubaline milk), 5C5B (50% caprine milk and 50% bubaline milk), 3C7B (30% caprine milk and 70% bubaline milk) and B (100% bubaline milk). According to QDA results, the yoghurt made from bubaline milk (group B) showed highest firmness and acidity than all other milk sample groups. All the experimental groups made from the mixtures of two milks achieved similar good sensory scores. These findings evidenced that the mixture of caprine and bubaline milks might be an efficient strategy to produce a new dairy product with good consistency and pleasant flavor.
https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2012.71.32403
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Borges KC, Medeiros AC; Correia RTP. Iogurte de leite de búfala sabor cajá (Spondias lútea L.): caracterização físico-química e aceitação sensorial entre indivíduos de 11 a 16 anos. Alim Nutr. 2009;20(2):295-300.

2. Jumah R, Shaker R, Abu-Jdayil B. Effect of milk source on the rheological properties of yogurt during the gelation process. Int J Dairy Tech. 2003;54(3):89-93.

3. Stelios K; Emmanuel A. Characteristics of set type yoghurt made from caprine or ovine milk and mixtures of the two. Intl J Food Sci Technol. 2004;39(3):319-24.

4. Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística – IBGE. Censo Agropecuário 2006. [acesso 22 maio 2009]. Disponível em: [http://www.ibge.gov.br].

5. El-Agamy E. The challenge of cow milk protein allergy. Small Rum Res. 2007;68(1):64-72.

6. Park Y. Hypoallergenic and therapeutic significance of goat milk. Small Rum Res. 1994;14(2):151-9.

7. Wal JM. Structure and function of milk allergens. Allergy. 2001;56(67):35-8.

8. Clarck S, Sherbon JW. Genetic variants of alpha s1-CN in goat milk: breed distribution and associations with milk composition and coagulation properties.Small Rum Res. 2000;38(1):135-43.

9. Barrionuevo M, Alferez M, Lopes-Aliaga I, Sanz-Sampelayo M, Campos M. Beneficial effect of goat milk on nutritive utilization of iron and copper in malabsorption syndrome. J Dairy Sci. 2002;85(9):657-64.

10. Lara-Villoslada F, Debras E, Nieto A, Concha A, Galvez J, Lopez-Huertas, et al. Oligosaccharides isolated from goat milk reduce intestinal inflammation in a rat model of dextran sodium sulfate-induced colitis. Clin Nutr. 2006;25(3):477-88.

11. Vargas M, Cháfer M, Albors A, Chirat A, González-Martinez C. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of yogurt produced from mixtures of cows’ and goats’ milk. Int Dairy J. 2008;18(12):1146-52.

12. Martin-Diana AB, Janer C, Pelaez C, Requena T. Development of a fermented goat’s milk containing probiotic bacteria. Int Dairy J. 2003;13(10):827-33.

13. Storry J, Grandison A, Milliard D, Owen A, Ford G. Chemical composition and coagulation properties of rennet milk from different breeds and species of ruminant. J Dairy Res. 1983;50(2):215-24.

14. Park Y. Rheological characteristics of goat and sheep milk. Small Rum Res. 2007;68(1):73-87.

15. Park Y, Juarez M, Ramos M, Haenlein G. Physicochemical characteristics of goat and sheep milk.Small Rum Res. 2007;68(1):88-113.

16. Domagala J. Instrumental texture, syneresis and microstructure of yoghurts prepared from goat, cow and sheep milk. Int J Food Properties.2009;12(3):605-15.

17. Ordóñez JA. Tecnologia de alimentos: alimentos de origem animal. Porto Alegre: Artmed; 2005.

18. Hafemann J, Benedet HD, Teixeira E. Caracterização físico-sensorial do iogurte produzido com leite bubalino em mistura com leite bovino. Rev Inst Latic Cândido Tostes. 2007;62(354):23-30.

19. Uysal H, Kilic S, Kavas G, Akbulut N, Kesenkas H. Some properties of set yoghurt made from caprine milk and bovine-caprine milk mixtures fortified by ultrafiltration or the addition of skim milk powder. Int J Dairy Tech. 2003;56(3):177-81.

20. Verruma MR, Salgado JM. Análise química do leite de búfala em comparação ao leite de vaca. Sci Agric. 1994;51(1):131-7.

21. Han B, Meng Y, Li M, Yang Y, Ren F, Zeng Q, et al. A survey on the microbiological and chemical composition of buffalo milk in China. Food Cont. 2007;18(6):742-6.

22. Ahmad S, Gaucher I, Rousseau F, Beaucher E, Pito M, Grongnet J, et al. Effects on the acidification on physical-chemical characteristics of buffalo milk: a comparison with cow ́s milk. Food Chem. 2008;106(1):11-7.

23. Cunha Neto OC, Oliveira CAF, Hota RM, Sobral PJA. Avaliação físico-química e sensorial do iogurte natural produzido com leite de búfala contendo diferentes níveis de gordura. Ciênc Tecnol Alim. 2005;25(3):448-53.

24. Menard O, Ahmad S, Rousseau F, Briard-Bion V, Gaucheron F, Lopez C. Buffalo vs. cow milk: fat globules: size distribution, zeta potential, compositions in total fatty acids and in polar lipids from the milk fat globule membrane. Food Chem. 2010;120(2):544-51.

25. Correia R, Borges K. Posicionamento do consumidor frente ao consumo de leite de cabra e seus derivados na cidade de Natal-RN. Rev Inst Latic Cândido Tostes. 2009;64(366):36-43.

26. Correia R, Clementino I, Bezerra MF, Silva PDL. Avaliação do procedimento utilizado para elaboração de iogurte de leite de cabra. Rev Inst Latic Cândido Tostes. 2006;61(351):317-20.

27. Magalhães M, Silva J, Pedrini M, Correia R. Néctares de frutas tropicais enriquecidos com iogurtes de leite de cabra comparados com formulações utilizando leite bovino. Rev Inst Cândido Tostes. 2006;353(61):44-50.

28. Stone H, Sidel JL. Sensory Evaluation Practices. 2. ed. Orlando: Academic Press; 1992.

29. Eknaes M, Skeie S. Effect of different level of roughage availability and contrast levels of concentrate supplementation on flavor of goat milk. Small Rum Res. 2006;66(1):32-43.

30. Mesquita IVU, Costa RG, Queiroga RC, Medeiros AN. Efeito da dieta na composição química e características sensoriais de leite de cabra. Rev Inst Latic Cândido Tostes. 2004;58(337):1-14.

31. Queiroga RC, Costa RG, Madruga MS. Leite caprino: aspectos aromáticos e nutricionais.Rev Inst Latic Cândido Tostes. 2003;58(330):3-20.

32. Mahdian E, Tehrani M. Evaluation of the effect of milk total solids on the relationship between growth and activity of starter cultures and quality of concentrated yoghurt. Eur J Agric Environ Sci. 2007;2(5):587-92.

33. Özer B, Robinson R. The behavior of starter cultures in concentrated yoghurt (labneh) produced by different techniques. LWT. 1999;32(7):391-5.

34. Ribeiro EP, Seravalli EAG. Química de alimentos. 2. ed. São Paulo: Blucher; 2007.

35. Ceballos L, Morales Z, Adarve G, Castro J, Martinez L, Sampelayo M. Composition of goat and cow milk produced under similar conditions and analyzed by identical methodology. J Food Compos Anal. 2009;22(4):322-9.

36. Jandal JM. Comparative aspects of goat and sheep milk. Small Rum Res. 1996;22(2):177-85.

37. Macedo MP, Wechsler FS, Ramos AA, Amaral JB, Souza JC, Resende FD, et al.Composição físico-química e produção do leite de búfalas da raça mediterrâneo no oeste do estado de São Paulo. Rev Bras Zootec. 2001;30(3):1084-8.

38. Haenlein G. Goat milk in human nutrition. Small Rum Res. 2004;51(2):155-61.

39. Mowlem A. Marketing goat dairy produce in the UK. Small Rum Res. 2005;60(1-2):207-13.

40. Ribeiro AC, Ribeiro SDA. Specialty products made from goat milk. Small Rum Res. 2010;89(2-3):225-33.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2012 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.