Hemodialysis water: occurrence of yeasts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and heterotrophic bacteria
pdf (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

water
hemodialysis
Pseudomonas aeruginosa
yeast
heterotrophic bacteria
disinfections

How to Cite

1.
Simões M, Pires M de FC. Hemodialysis water: occurrence of yeasts, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and heterotrophic bacteria. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2004 Dec. 30 [cited 2024 Jul. 3];63(2):224-31. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/34862

Abstract

During the summer and winter of 2003, 200 samples of water used for hemodialysis procedures collected from two hospitals A and B were analyzed. The water samples were collected from the following sites: P1 - from incoming public treated water, from city water mains (N=18 samples); P2 - from pre-treatment site (N=18); P3 - from reverse osmosis (OR) treatment site (N=18); P4 - from hemodialysis machine water entry site (N=28); P5 - pre-dialyzing solution (N=30); P6 - from post-dialyzing site with arterial and venous blood lines (N=17); P7- from loop (N=9); P8 - from carbon filter (N=11); P9 - from reuse C site (N=18); P10 – from reuse B site (N=18); and P11- from water storage tank for OR (N=11). The analyses were performed according to the methodology recommended in the Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and
Wastewater, 1995, by means of the following assays: pour plate technique for heterotrophic bacteria (BH) counting in R2A agar; filter membrane technique for Pseudomonas aeruginosa detection in Cetrimide agar; culture in Sabouraud agar for yeast; technique for fluoride and conductivity determination; determination of sulfate and nitrate performed according to “Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz”
(Instituto Adolfo Lutz Analytical Guidelines), 1985...

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2004.63.34862
pdf (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Amato, R.L. Water Treatment for Hemodialysis, Including the Latest AMMI Standards. J Neprol Nurs, 28:612-9,2001.

2. Arvanitidou, M. et al. High level of recovery of fungi from water and dialysate in haemodialysis units. J. Hospital Infection, 45: 225-30, 2000

3. Arvanitidou, M et al. Occurrence and antimicrobial resistance of Gramnegative bacteria isolated in haemodialysis water and dialysate of renal units: results of a Greek multicentre study. J. Applied Microbiology, 95:180-5, 2003.

4. Azevedo, S.M et al. Human intoxication by microcystins during renal dialysis treatment in Caruaru-Brazil. Toxicology, 182: 441-446,2002.

5. Bambauer, R. et al. Contamination of dialysis water and dialysate. A survey of 30 centers. ASAIO J., 40: 1012-6,1994.

6. Brasil, Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária, Resolução Diretoria Colegiada Nº154, - Diário Oficial da União, de 17 de junho de 2004, Brasília; Seção 1, p.65-9.

7. Brasil, Portaria N° 518, de março de 2004, Gabinete do Ministro – Ministério Da Saúde, Diário Oficial da União, Brasília n° 59 de 26/03/2004, Seção 1, pág. 266 –70

8. Brem, A. Fungal peritonitis in patient on continuous ambulatory peritonial dialysis. Europ. J.Clin.Microbio.Infect.Disease, 17: 839-43, 1998

9. Cappelli, G. et al. Biofilms invade nephrology: effects in hemodiálisis. J. Blood Purif, 18(3):224-30, 2000.

10. Capelli, G. et al. C. Effects of biofilm formation on haemodialysis monitor disinfection. J. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 18(10): 2105-11, 2003.

11. Center For disease Control & Prevention, USA e World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. Epi Info 6, 1994; version 6.02.

12. Eaton, A.D. et al. Standard Methods for Examination of Water and Wastewater, Washington, DC. (APHA). 19th ed., 1995.

13. Favero, M.S. et al.. Dialysis-associated infections and their control. J. Hospital Infection, 24: 357-78,1998.

14. Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Normas Analíticas do Instituto Adolfo Lutz. Métodos Químicos e Físico para Análise de Alimentos. São Paulo. 3a.ed., Sulfato e Nitrato, 1985; V.1, p.302-30.

15. Kurtzman, C.P. e Fell, J.W.. The yeasts: a taxonomic study, New York, 1998.

16. Linde, K. et al. Improved bacteriological surveillance of haemodialysis fluids: a comparison between Tryptic soy agar and Reasoner’s 2A media. Nephrol Dial Transplant, 14: 2433-7, 1999.

17. Oie, S. et al. Microbial contamination of dialysate and its prevention in haemodialysis units. J. Hospital Infection, 54:115-9, 2003.

18. Palleroni, N.J. Genus I – Pseudomonas. Bergey’s Manual of systematic bacteriology. Baltimore: William & Wilkins, 1986, p.141-99.

19. Pisan, B. et al. Surto de bacteriemia por Pseudomonas aeruginosa na Unidade de Hemodiálise de um hospital de Campinas, São Paulo, Brasil. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz, 59(1/2): 51-6, 2000.

20. São Paulo, Secretaria de Estado da Saúde, Centro de Vigilância. Roteiro de Inspeção da Vigilância Sanitária de Serviços de Terapia renal Substitutiva, 1997.

21. Silva, A.M.M. et al. Revisão/Atualização em Diálise: Água para hemodiálise. J. Bras. Nefrol. 18 (2):180-8,1996.

22. Teixeira, P et al.. Evaluation Of Survival Patterns And Cellular Injury Of Pseudomonas aeruginosa In Different Bottled Waters Stored Under Various Conditions. J. Food Safety. 21: 167-80,

23. USA, Pharmacopeia, USP XXIV, Rockville, Twinbrook Parkway, Bacterial Endotoxins Test, 1995; 24:1829-30.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2004 Revista do Instituto Adolfo Lutz

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.