Abstract
This study analyzes the effect of the inoculum concentration of Haemophilus influenzae strains to determine the antimicrobial susceptibility. A total 98 strains isolated from cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was studied through the disk diffusion method and the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC). The results showed that with the inoculum 108 UFC/mL, 56 strains were resistant to ampicillin, but with this inoculum diluted to 106 UFC/mL, 10 cepas of the strains were resistant to this antiobiotic in the disk diffusion method The correlation of the inoculum 108 UFC/ml and 106 UFC/ml in the disk diffusion method using disks containing ampicillin, cephalotin, cephoxitin, fosfomycin, penicillin and sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim showed that the inoculum concentration is a significante factor in the strain susceptibility, mainly when testing betalactamic antibiotics. This observation led to a standardization of inoculum size at 106 UFC/mL when testing H. influenzae, in order to obtain dependable and reproducible results.
References
2. DOERN, G. V.; JORGENSEN, J. H.; THORNSBERRY, C.;PRESTON, D.A. Prevalence of antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates of Haemophilus influenzae: A collaborative study. Diag. Microbiot: Infect, Dis. 4:95-107, 1986.
3. DOERN, G. V.; DAUM, G. S.; TUBERT, T. A. Ampicillin disk diffusion susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae. J. Clin. Microbiol. 25:1675- 1678, 1987.
4. FERNANDES, P.B.; HARDY, D.; BARLER, R.; McDONALD, E.; PINTAR, J.; RAMER, N.; SWANSON, R.; GADE, E. Susceptibility testing of macrolede antibiotecs against Haemophilus influenzae and correlation of in vitro results with in vivo effecacy in a mouse septicemia model. Antimicrob. Agents. Chemother. 31:1243-1250, 1987.
5. FURTADO, L. G.; MEDERIROS, A. A. Single-disk diffusion (Kirby-Bauer) of susceptibility of Proteus mirabilis to chloranphenicol significance of the intermediate category. J. Clin. Microbiol. 12:550- 563, 1980.
6. KRONVALL, G.; RINGERTZ, S.; KARLSON, 1.; GORANSSON, E.; DORNBUSCH, K. Laboratory and species-specific interpretive breakpoints for disk diffusion tests of chloranphenicol susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 32:1484-1489, 1988.
7. MENDELMAN, P. M.; WILEY, E. A.; STULL, T. L.; CLAUSEN, C.; CHAFFIN, D. O. Problems with current recommendations for susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 34:1480-1484, 1990.
8. NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY STANDARDS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Approved standard M2 - A3. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Villanova, Pa, 1984.
9. NATIONAL COMMITTEE FOR CLINICAL LABORATORY STANDARS. Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests. Tentative Standard. M2 - T4. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Villanova, Pa, 1988.
10. RINGERTZ, S.; LILYEQUEST-OLSON, B.; KROWALL, G. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of Haemophilus influenzae improvement of accuracy of the disk diffusion test. J. Agents Chemoter. 26:479-489, 1990.
11. ROBERTS, D. E.; INGOLD, A.; WANT, S. V.; MAY, J. R. Osmotically stable L forms of Haemophilus influenzae and their significance in testing sensitivity to penicillim. J. Clin. Path. 27:560-564, 1974.
12. SPIEGEL, M. R. Estatística. São Paulo, McGrow-Hill, 1978.
13. TAKEDA, A. K.; UMEKITA, L. F.; BOSCARDEN, N. B.; MELLES, C. E. A.; TAUNAY, A. E. Imunoeletroforese cruzada no diagnóstico da meningite por Haemophilus influenzae tipo b. Rev. Inst. Adolfo Lutz. 34:165-169, 1979.
14. WILLIAMS, J. D.; KATTAM, S. Haemophilus species: Laboratory Methods in Antimicrobial Chematherapy. London, Churchil Levingstone, 1978. p.106-111.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Copyright (c) 1994 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal