Evaluation of mercury bi-iodide as preservative of biological samples
pdf (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

preservative, biologic sample
mercury bi-iodide (HgI 2 ) as biologic sample preservative
feces, biologic sample preservative

How to Cite

1.
Aguiar PR de, Ventura VR, Burkart IHV, Nascimento JA do, Lima IAR de, Westphalen S da R. Evaluation of mercury bi-iodide as preservative of biological samples. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 1981 Jun. 30 [cited 2024 May 15];41(1):47-52. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/36993

Abstract

In order to evaluate the mercury bi-iodide (HgI.) as a preservative, this chernical was studied regarding its ability to preserve biological material and to avoid agglutination of particles. To the sediment obtained from 400 stool specimens, mercuric potassium iodide was dissolved in íormaldehyde, alcohol and physiologic saline solution, at a concentration of 0.2%. To one volume of fecal sediment, three volumes of the preserva tive were added in each of 400 stool specimens. The experiment was repeated using, this time, 0.1% of the preservative prepared with benzene, alcohol and iso toriic saline solution. The results were compared with those obtained with standard preservatives such as Railliet and Henry, Schaudinn and MIF (merthiolate, iodine and formaldehyde). Observations done after six months revealed that 0.2% mercuric potassium iodide solution (first method) suitably preserved cysts and trophozoites of protozoa as well as eggs and adult worms of helminths, excep t eggs of Hymenolepis nana and Hymenolepis diminuta, which demonstrated better preservation when the second method was employed. The controle presented similar results. It was found that mercuric potassium íodide does not agglutinate stool particles.

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.1981.41.36993
pdf (Português (Brasil))

References

1. CRAIG, C.F. - Laboratory diagnosis of protozoan diseases. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1942. p. 45.

2. FAUST, E.C.; D'ANTONI, J.S.; ODOM, V.; M.ILLE"R, M.J.; PERES, C.; SA WITZ, W.; THOMEN, L.F.: TOBIE, J. & WALKER, J.H. - A critical study of clinical laboratory technics for the diagnosis of protozoan cysts and helminth eggs in feces. r. Preliminary communication, Amer. J. trop. Med., 18:169-83, 1938.

3. HOFFMAN, W.A.; PONS, S.A. & JANER, J.L. - The sedimentation-concentration method in schistosomiasis mansoni. Puerto Rico J. publ. Hlth trop. Med., 9 :283-98, 1934.

4. JUNOD, CH. - Technique ccprologiqus nouvelle essentiellement destinée a Ia concentration des trophozo'ites d'amibes. Bull. Soc._Pathol. exot., 65 :390-8, 1972.

5. RAILLIET, A. & HENRY, A.C.L. apud AMATO NETO, V. & CORRÊA, L.L. - Exame parasitológico das fezes. 4a ed. São Paulo, Sarvier, 1980. p. 95.

6. RITCHIE, L.S. - An ether sedimentation technique for routine stool examinations. Bull. V.S. Army med. Dep., 8:326, 1948.

7. SAPERO, J.J. & LA WLESS, D.K. - The "MIF" stain-preservation technique for the identification of protozoa. Amer. J. trop. Med. Hyg., 2:613-9, 1953.

8. SCHAUDINN, F. apud CRAIG, C.F.1, p. 46.

9. WALTER-HALBERSTADT, P. Wissen-schaftlicher Teil. Steril-Catgut. Apothekerzeitung, Berlin, 47: 1449-50, 1932.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 1981 Instituto Adolfo Lutz Journal

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.