Resumen
This study identified the modal salient behavior, the normative and the control modal beliefs
on the nutritional label use for the prepackaged food products among the college students.
In November 2015, the exploratory qualitative research was conducted with 19 nutrition
students, applying the concepts of Theory of Planned Behavior. Contents analysis of two
organized focus groups and the statistical descriptive analysis of quantitative variables were
performed. Both focus groups mentioned the advantages of the use of nutritional information,
as the assistance for choosing the healthy food. A specific disadvantage associated with the
mentioned nutritional claims was this influence on the purchase decisions (behavioral beliefs).
The students mentioned their parents and siblings as the peoples who approve the use of this
information, when they purchase a product (normative beliefs). Small lettering and difficulty
to interpret the portions size indicated in the nutritional information on the labels were the
factors, which could difficult their use. Making easy to read the nutritional claims tend to
stimulate the purchasing decisions (control beliefs). Eleven salient modal beliefs were identified,
which may explain participants’ behavior when using information and nutrition claims.
Citas
and Agriculture Organization of the United
Nations - FAO. Food labelling. 5.ed, Rome:
WHO/FAO; 2007. Available in:http://www.fao.
org/docrep/010/a1390e/a1390e00.htm
2. Temple NJ, Fraser J. Food labels: a critical
assessment. Nutrition. 2014, 30(3):257-60.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2013.06.012
3. Hawkes C. Nutrition labels and health
claims: the global regulatory environment.
Genebra: World Health Organization; 2004.
Available in: http://apps.who.int/iris/
bitstream/10665/42964/1/9241591714.pdf
4. Christoph MJ, An R, Ellison B. Correlates of
nutrition label use among college students and
young adults: a review. Public Health Nutr.
2016;19(12):2135-48. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S1368980015003183
5. Fishbein M, Ajzen I. Predicting and
changing behavior: the reasoned action
approach. 1.ed New York: Psychology Press.
Taylor & Francis group; 2010. https://doi.
org/10.4324/9780203838020
6. Conner M, Sparks P. Theory of Planned Behaviour
and Health Behaviour. In: Conner M, Norman P,
editors. Predicting Health Behaviour. 2.ed. New York:
Open University Press; 2005. p. 170-222. Available in:
https://soh.iums.ac.ir/uploads/32_282_44_13.pdf
7. Kitzinger J. Focus groups with users and providers
of health care. In: Pope C, Mays N, editors.
Qualitative Research in Health Care. 2.ed. London:
BMJ Books; 2000. p. 20-29.
8. Brazilian Market Research Association. Brazilian
Economic Classification Criteria. 2015 and social
class distribution update for 2016. Available in: www.
abep.org/Servicos/Download.aspx?id=13
9. Gagné C, Godin G. Les théories sociales
cognitives: guide pour la mesure des variables
et le développement de questionnaire.
Québec: Bibliothèque Nationale. 1999.
Available in: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.or
g/0e2b/2f92f199f9f6939fb7b0bde04c80856c
a90e.pdf
10. Besler HT, Buyuktuncer Z, Uyar MF. Consumer
understanding and use of food and nutrition
labeling in Turkey. J Nutr Educ Behav.
2012;44(6):584-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
jneb.2012.01.005
11. Cooke R, Papadaki A. Nutrition label use mediates
the positive relationship between nutrition
knowledge and attitudes towards healthy eating
with dietary quality among university students in
the UK. Appetite. 2014;83:297-303. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.appet.2014.08.039
12. Wahlich C, Gardner B, McGowan L. How, when and
why do young women use nutrition information on
food labels? A qualitative analysis. Psychol Health.
2013;28(2):202-216. https://doi.org/10.1080/088
70446.2012.716439
13. Miller LM, Cassady DL. The effects of nutrition
knowledge on food label use. A review of the
literature. Appetite. 2015;92:207-16. https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2015.05.029
14. Hodgkins CE, Raats MM, Fife-Schaw C,
Peacock M, Gröppel-Klein A, Koenigstorfer
J et al. Guiding healthier food choice:
systematic comparison of four front-ofpack labelling systems and their effect on
judgements of product healthiness. Br J Nutr.
2015;113(10):1652-63. https://doi.org/10.1017/
S0007114515000264
15. Lim HJ, Kim MJ, Kim KW. Factors
associated with nutrition label use among
female college students applying the theor y
of planned behavior. Nutr Res Pract.
2015;9(1):63-70. https://doi.org/10.4162/
nrp.2015.9.1.63
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2019 Revista del Instituto Adolfo Lutz