Evaluation of Endosulfan residue in pod and soybean matrices for comparation of two aplication systems of formulated product
PDF (Português (Brasil))

How to Cite

1.
M.D. Corrêa C, J. do V. Oliveira J, L. Tornisielo V. Evaluation of Endosulfan residue in pod and soybean matrices for comparation of two aplication systems of formulated product. Rev Inst Adolfo Lutz [Internet]. 2001 Dec. 31 [cited 2024 Nov. 23];60(2):135-9. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/RIAL/article/view/35806

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the residue levels of the α-endosulfan, β-endosulfan and endosulfan sulphate in pod and soybean. Soybean was cultivated in 900m2 divided in three equal parcels: control (without endosulfan), PIM and conventional system. The endosulfan residue levels were quantified by gas chromatography equipped with electron capture detector (Ni63). It was showed 6 and 7 times more residues of total endosulfan in PIM and conventional systems, respectively, in pod than soybean. In both systems were not detected endosulfan sulphate within method quantified limit of 0,5 mg/kg and 0,1 mg/kg for soybean and pod, respectively. It concluded that pod showed protector effect to grains in both systems. Both treatments were efficient to pest control, however PIM was suggested to use in soybean because it results in low contamination level of food. The soybean was adequate for eat in relation at Pesticide Residue Brazilian Legislation.

 

https://doi.org/10.53393/rial.2001.60.35806
PDF (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Aizawa, H. Metabolic maps of pesticides. New York: Academic Press, 1982. 242 p.

2. Associação Brasileira das Indústrias de Óleos Vegetais – ABIOVE. http:// www.abiove.com.br (1998).

3. Brasil – Ministério da Saúde. Relação de substâncias para uso domissanitário: Portarias do Ministério da Saúde. 1985. São Paulo: International Life Sciences Institute – ILSI, 1995. 716p.

4. Costa, S.L. A soja na produção de alimentos. In: Seminário Nacional de Pesquisa de Soja, Londrina, 1978. Anais. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 1979, v. 2, p. 235-243.

5. Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Recomendações técnicas para a cultura da soja na Região Central do Brasil 1996/97. Londrina: EMBRAPA-CNPSo, 1996. 164 p.

6. Ferreira, M.S. et al. Resíduos de canfeclor, DDT, endrin, e endosulfan em grãos de soja. Hig. Alim., 2(4): 201-209, 1983.

7. Lehr, W. Statement concerning the chemical classification of endosulfan. Frankfurt: HOECHST, 1993. p.1-3. (Report, PSR-93/ 034).

8. Luke, M.A.; Froberg, J.E.; Masumoto, H.T. Extraction and clean-up of organochlorine, organophosphate, organonitrogen and hidrocarbon pesticides in produce for determination by gas-liquid chromatography. J. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., 58(5): 1020-1026, 1975.

9. Maier-Bode, H. Properties, effects, residues and analytics of the insecticide endosulfan. Residue Reviews, 22, p. 1-44, 1968.

10. Mariconi, F.A.M. Algumas informações sobre endosulfan. Piracicaba: ESALQ, Departamento de Zoologia, 1987. 19p.

11. Portela, F. Bases bioquímicas para o melhoramento de variedades de soja (Glycine max (L) Merrill., 1977). 114p. Tese (Doutorado) – Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto.

12. Van Zoonen, P. (Ed.). Analytical methods for pesticide residues in foodstuffs. 6. Ed. Netherlands: Ministery of Public Health, Welfare and Sport, 1996. Part 1, p. 1-22.
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2001 Célia M.D. Corrêa, Jorge J. do V. Oliveira, Valdemar L. Tornisielo

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.