Positivity of the anti-PGL-I rapid test in clinically difficult-to-manage situations in leprosy
Capa da revista Hansenologia Internationalis, volume 51, 2026, com o título em destaque e uma lupa focada em um grupo de figuras humanas estilizadas, simbolizando pesquisa e saúde pública.
pdf (Português (Brasil))

Keywords

Leprosy
Recurrence
Treatment failure
Leprosy reactions
Mycobacterium leprae
Diagnostic techniques and procedures

How to Cite

1.
Oliveira R dos S, Bezerra GH, Sousa ALOM de. Positivity of the anti-PGL-I rapid test in clinically difficult-to-manage situations in leprosy: evidence from a Brazilian reference center. Hansen. Int. [Internet]. 2026 Aug. 7 [cited 2026 Aug. 14];51:e41956. Available from: https://periodicos.saude.sp.gov.br/hansenologia/article/view/41956

Abstract

Introduction: leprosy remains a significant public health problem in Brazil, with complex clinical situations that frequently challenge conventional diagnostic and therapeutic management. Objective: to evaluate the positivity of the rapid anti-phenolic glycolipid I test in patients attended at a reference service classified into four difficult-to-manage situations: suspected or confirmed relapse, therapeutic failure, difficult-to-control lepra reaction, and difficult leprosy diagnosis. Methods: cross-sectional study conducted with 23 adult patients, predominantly multibacillary, attended at a reference service. Results: the rapid test was reactive in 15 cases (65.2%). Among patients with suspected or confirmed relapse, the test was positive in six of nine cases, assisting in diagnostic reassessment, including one case with negative conventional tests. In cases of difficult-to-control lepra reaction, three of five patients had a reactive result, helping to confirm underlying bacillary activity. In difficult diagnostic cases, the test was positive in four of seven patients, prompting repeat biopsy with diagnostic confirmation in two cases and supporting the treatment initiation in two others. In both cases of suspected therapeutic failure, the test was reactive, corroborating the maintenance of serological activity. Discussion: the findings demonstrate that the rapid test can serve as a relevant complementary tool, especially in scenarios where conventional examinations are inconclusive or insufficient to guide clinical management. Conclusion: the rapid anti-phenolic glycolipid I test proved useful in the management of complex leprosy situations and should be interpreted in an integrated manner alongside clinical evaluation and available conventional examinations.

https://doi.org/10.47878/hi.2026.v.51.41956
pdf (Português (Brasil))

References

1. Huang CY, Su SB, Chen KT. An update of the diagnosis, treatment, and prevention of leprosy: a narrative review. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024;103(34):e39006. doi: https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000039006.

2. Collin SM, Lima A, Heringer S, Sanders V, Pessotti HA, Deps P. Systematic review of Hansen disease attributed to Mycobacterium lepromatosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2023;29(7):1376-85. doi: https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2907.230024.

3. Yang J, Li X, Sun Y, Zhang L, Jin G, Li G, et al. Global epidemiology of leprosy from 2010 to 2020: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the proportion of sex, type, grade 2 deformity, and age. Pathog Glob Health. 2022;116(8):467-76. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/20477724.2022.2057722.

4. World Health Organization. Global leprosy (Hansen disease) update, 2024: beyond zero cases – what elimination of leprosy really means. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2025 [cited 2025 May 10];100(37):365-84. Available from: https://iris.who.int/server/api/core/bitstreams/b4ad088c-c66a-46b9-ac80-30576097b57b/content.

5. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Boletim Epidemiológico de Hanseníase 2025. Brasília: MS; 2025 [citado em 10 maio 2025]. Disponível em: https://www.gov.br/saude/pt-br/centrais-de-conteudo/publicacoes/boletins/epidemiologicos/especiais/2025/boletim-epidemiologico-de-hanseniasenumero-especial-jan-2025.pdf.

6. Froes Junior LAR, Sotto MN, Trindade MAB. Leprosy: clinical and immunopathological characteristics. An Bras Dermatol. 2022;97(3):338-47. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abd.2021.08.006.

7. Dewi DAR, Djatmiko CBP, Rachmawati I, Arkania N, Wiliantari NM, Nadhira F. Immunopathogenesis of type 1 and type 2 leprosy reaction: an update review. Cureus. 2023;15(11):e49155. doi: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.49155.

8. Ministério da Saúde (BR). Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas da Hanseníase. Brasília: MS; 2022 [citado em 10 maio 2025]. Disponível em: https://bvsms.saude.gov.br/bvs/publicacoes/protocolo_clinico_diretrizes_terapeuticas_hanseniase.pdf.

9. Romero CP, Castro R, Brasil PEA, Pereira DR, Pinheiro RO, Toscano CM, et al. Accuracy of rapid point-of-care serological tests for leprosy diagnosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2022;117:e220317. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760220317.

10. Saavedra D, Nobre ML, Guimarães RA, Fogaça MTB, Goulart IMB, Barreto JA, et al. A multicenter evaluation of leprosy rapid test Fast ML Flow Hanseníase in Brazil. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2025;44:985-95. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10096-025-05071-2.

11. Nascimento ACM, Santos DF, Antunes DE, Gonçalves MA, Santana MAO, Dornelas B, et al. Leprosy relapse: a retrospective study on epidemiologic, clinical, and therapeutic aspects at a Brazilian referral center. Int J Infect Dis. 2022;118:44-51. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijid.2022.01.009.

12. Silva FV, Sousa GS, Ferraz EB, Silva PRS, Takahashi JA, Espinosa OA, et al. Leprosy relapse after multidrug therapy: systematic review and metaanalysis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19(10):e0011870. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0011870.

13. Fonseca AMFA, Rosa PS, Belone AFF, Soares CT, Bertoluci DFF, Diório SM, et al. Therapeutic failure of multidrug therapy for leprosy: a retrospective case series in a hyperendemic Brazilian city. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025;19(11):e0013616. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0013616.

14. Dornelas BC, Costa WVT, Abreu JPF, Daud JS, Campos FDAR, Campos DRO, et al. Role of histopathological, serological and molecular findings for the early diagnosis of treatment failure in leprosy. BMC Infect Dis. 2024;24(1):1085. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12879-024-09937-2.

15. Silva JC, Oliveira RA, Santos LFS, Pascoal LM, Santos FS, Costa ACPJ, et al. Factors associated with multibacillary leprosy in a region of northeastern Brazil. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2023;17(6):846-53. doi: https://doi.org/10.3855/jidc.17284.

16. Pierneef L, Hooij A, Jong D, Wassenaar G, Verhard E, Tjon Kon Fat E, et al. Rapid test for Mycobacterium leprae infection: a practical tool for leprosy. Infect Dis Poverty. 2024;13(1):88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40249-024-01262-9.

17. Niitsuma ENA, Bueno IC, Fernandes GR, Abreu MNS, Lana FCF. Anti-PGL-I seropositivity and development of leprosy in contacts: a comprehensive analysis of sociodemographic determinants, genetic susceptibility, and exposure characteristics to Mycobacterium leprae. Mem Inst Oswaldo Cruz. 2025;120:e240061. doi: https://doi.org/10.1590/0074-02760240061.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2026 Renata dos Santos Oliveira, Guilherme Holanda Bezerra, Ana Lúcia Osório Maroccolo de Sousa

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.